05-20
Analysis of the Subject Issues of Shareholders filing a lawsuit to revoke the resolution of the shareholders' meeting
In the process of company operation, the shareholders' meeting and general meeting are the power institutions of the company. The shareholders' meeting and the general meeting of shareholders shall..
05-11
Is it difficult to inherit bank deposits? Optimize new policies to further facilitate and benefit the people
I believe many families have faced or are about to face such problems. After the passing of their relatives and elders, there are still deposits left in their bank accounts. These deposits ..
04-22
Installing Elevators in Old Residential Areas - Analysis of Litigation Possibility
Since 2022, various regions across the country have been actively promoting the installation of elevators in old residential areas within their jurisdiction, in order to facilitate the daily..
In a recent case, a Brazilian-Taiwanese client was gravely injured in a traffic incident involving a taxi belonging to the Qiangsheng Company. Shanghai Founder Law Firm secured a vital victory in this case, with our client receiving almost 190,000RMB in compensation and damages.
The client was diagnosed with a fracture on the left side of his femoral neck – a class 10 disability according to Chinese law. The defendants contested that our compensation claim was exorbitant and unjustified in light of the fact that our client did not receive his treatment at a public hospital. They continued this line of inquisition, arguing that his loss of income was unsubstantial and an augmenting factor in the discordance between the factual matter and the value of our compensation claim.
We rebutted these claims, maintaining that the fee was appropriate because the clients salary was more than that of his Labour contract, and provided a series of evidences to this end. With regards to the medication fee, as our client was not a Chinese national, his opting for a private hospital for treatment was neither unwarranted or undue.
Consequently, the court ruled in favour of our client, accepting most of our propositions and awarding him compensation amounting to almost 190,000RMB
