Installing Elevators in Old Residential Areas - Analysis of Litigation Possibility

Since 2022, various regions across the country have been actively promoting the installation of elevators in old residential areas within their jurisdiction, in order to facilitate the daily life scenes of residents. However, at the same time, the neighborhood disputes caused by the installation of elevators have also become increasingly fierce. Next, the author will discuss the possible types of disputes, litigation potential, and preparation of relevant materials regarding the recent elevator installation dispute that occurred in the consulting unit.

At present, the common disputes caused by "adding elevators" are due to the conflict between the negative effects of "adding elevators" on lighting, structure, noise, and house depreciation brought by low-level residents and the urgent need of high-rise residents to improve living conditions, which has evolved into infringement disputes that hinder the subsequent progress of "adding elevators" by low-level users.
In fact, in the internal negotiation process of the government agencies that the author participated in before, the filing of "ladder adding" disputes often became a major challenge, and the jurisdictional court often refused to file the case on the grounds of lack of legal basis for litigation requests. However, since November 8, 2023, the Supreme People's Court and the Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development jointly released a typical case of installing elevators in existing residential areas in old communities and answered questions from reporters, clarifying that according to Article 288 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China and Article 22 of the Accessible Environment Construction Law, the aforementioned disputes should be resolved through judicial channels, and the infringer should bear corresponding legal responsibilities.
After solving the problem of difficulty in filing a case, how to design a lawsuit request has become the next issue that rights holders need to consider. Based on existing case analysis, generally speaking, the proportion of lawsuits that require lower level residents to eliminate obstacles and stop infringement, which means "no longer obstructing the installation of elevators", is relatively high. In addition, rights holders can also demand that the infringer bear part of the lawyer's fees and construction delay costs.

Since the first threshold for adopting judicial channels has passed, what materials do residents usually need to prepare in order to obtain court support for their claims? Generally speaking, the following materials need to be prepared: the results and publicity of the first consultation, the results and publicity of the second unit building consultation, the "construction agency" agreement, the "elevator addition" agreement, the planning and design formula scheme and publicity situation, the feedback and handling plan for publicity, payment proof, and proof of infringement by the infringer, which is commonly known as the "obstruction of construction" certificate. If the above materials can be provided in sufficient detail and the process procedures meet the requirements of "double two-thirds" and "three quarters", there is a high probability that the plaintiff's lawsuit request will be supported by the court. Of course, if lower level residents want their interests to be protected, they can also request to modify the "elevator" design scheme to minimize the negative impact after providing sufficient evidence to prove the negative effects of the "elevator" on lighting, noise, structure, and even house depreciation.

At the end of this article, the author believes that although the number of judicial cases caused by "adding stairs" is increasing day by day, most judges also hope to facilitate mediation between the plaintiff and defendant in the court trial process. Therefore, considering the time and economic costs required for judicial litigation, perhaps the best solution to resolve such disputes is for both parties to sit down and have a good discussion, after all, as the ancient saying goes: distant relatives are better than close neighbors.

Prev：Is it difficult to inherit bank deposits? Optimize new policies to further facilitate and benefit the people　
Next：Guochuang Silk Road | Guidelines for Chinese Enterprises to Invest in Vietnam (1) - Market Access